Tuesday, September 30, 2008

"Pirates Party, Shoot Each Other"





This isn’t the plot of the latest Johnny Depp flick. No, it is something a bit more cuckoo than old Jack Sparrow. The title of this post, "Pirates Party, Shoot Each Other" is the exact title of the link on Fox News' homepage (pictured in the screenshot above). Never mind the fact that the link in question transports readers to the much more ambiguous story, with a much more ambiguous headline, of shots fired in the night that Fox actually reported. Never mind that any reports of deaths are currently unconfirmed, a point made even by the anonymous U.S. government official who claimed the pirates shot three of their own. Never mind the fact that the pirates themselves said the shots were fired to celebrate the Islamic holiday of Eid, which marks the end of Ramadaan.

The front page title remains: "Pirates Party, Shoot Each Other."

It isn't uncommon or surprising for Fox, or any other cog in the 24 hour mega-news machine, to distort the facts of a story so that they make for "better" news. However, it is much less common to find an example as blatant as this one, wherein the story's front-page link has a title which is called into question immediately upon reading the story. I am not saying that I think the pirates definitely did not shoot each other, but the facts of this story show that it is at unclear whether they did or did not. One thing is clear however, this story is presented in a way that makes factually unsubstantiated assumptions about what happened.

The unethical treatment of this story is not limited to the title it was given on Fox's homepage. While the anonymous government official is quoted in the lede of the story, the pirates are not quoted until the fifth graf. So not only did Fox decide that the statement of a government source was significantly more important than the contrary, and first hand, account of the pirates, they gave primacy to an anonymous source over a verifiable source. The link's title also misleads the target audience through the word "party." The use of pirates on party in the same sentence instantly conjures images of rum soaked debauchery and violence, but Eid is a religious holiday and drinking alcohol in excess is forbidden in many interpretations of the Koran.

It may seem excessive to harp on the minutia of this story, but these issues represent a widespread, and dangerous, trend in news media. Fox has to compete nationally with other news outlets, all of which are running the exact same stories. The only way for Fox, or any other 24 hour news operation, to compete is to amp up the drama. Consumers are more drawn to a story with a body count, so that is what Fox offered up in the link's title. It is a shame that journalism is no longer about reporting the truth exclusively and unconditionally. It seems that in 2008 if it isn't sexy -- it isn't news. Today's most popular journalists seem uninterested in dealing with the blatant erosion of journalism's core principles, so I hope the next generation, my generation, of journalists is more concerned with the ethical implications of their work. Otherwise, it seems I am going to have to change my major to creative writing if I want to get a job as a journalist.

3 comments:

Niklos Salontay said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Niklos Salontay said...

You see stuff like this all the time on Digg. One of the big problems with the site is people going around new stories and blindly digging stories without reading them. Sometimes there are more Diggs than page hits. Naturally, people make misleading and over-dramatic titles to generate more Diggs. So many blogs out there do the same thing too, and I guess this is one of the ways the MSM is trying to "adapt".

Also, the link you supplied changes to a story retitled:
"U.S. Officials Say Three Somali Pirates Dead After Shoot Out During Muslim Feast"

So there you go.

(I was trying not to double post but I messed the comment up.)

Ian Bowman-Henderson said...

Right, the fact that the story has a vastly different title than the link is the entire point. I tried to address that in the fourth sentence:

"Never mind the fact that the link in question transports readers to the much more ambiguous story, with a much more ambiguous headline..."

Sorry if it wasn't clear.